Bouamama · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference 2025 · Within-subject comparative biomechanical study · n=?

Decoding Backward Walking Neuromechanics: An Integrated Linear and Fractal EMG-Kinematic Analysis Revealing Therapeutic Potential from Normative Gait Signatures.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Within-subject comparative laboratory biomechanical study

PubMed 41336328 · doi:10.1109/EMBC58623.2025.11254157 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The authors compared forward walking and backward walking across three controlled speeds (2, 2.5, and 3 km/h). They evaluated linear and nonlinear electromyographic (EMG) features (using Higuchi's Fractal Dimension) across five frequency bands, alongside linear and nonlinear three-dimensional kinematic features for the hip, knee, and ankle joints.

What was found

The abstract reports general directions without exact numerical values, effect sizes, or p-values. Backward walking demonstrated increased overall muscle activity, notably in the vastus lateralis and rectus femoris, accompanied by heightened nonlinear neuromuscular complexity in mid- and high-frequency EMG bands. Conversely, gastrocnemius medialis muscle activity was consistently reduced. Kinematically, backward walking increased ankle variability and complexity in sagittal and frontal planes, reduced hip range of motion and variability, and altered knee kinematics to act predominantly as a stabilizer across tested speeds.

Why it matters

The findings characterize the specific neuromuscular and joint kinematic differences between forward and backward walking, providing baseline mechanical rationale for using backward walking in rehabilitation and strength conditioning to target quadriceps recruitment and ankle control.

Limits

The abstract omits sample size, participant demographics (such as age, sex, and health or athletic status), exact numerical results, confidence intervals, and statistical values. The study assesses immediate biomechanical responses in a controlled setting and does not evaluate clinical or longitudinal training outcomes.

Cited by