Stronge · Journal of family psychology : JFP : journal of the Division of Family Psychology of the American Psychological Association (Division 43) 2019 · observational panel study · n=20,774

Gender differences in the associations between relationship status, social support, and wellbeing.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Observational national panel study

PubMed 31094543 · doi:10.1037/fam0000540 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

Analyzed data from a national panel study in New Zealand (N = 20,774) to test whether perceived social support mediated the relationship between having a romantic partner and subjective wellbeing (life satisfaction and self-esteem), and whether these associations differed by gender.

What was found

The abstract reports no numerical values, effect sizes, confidence intervals, or p-values. It qualitatively reports that perceived social support partially mediated the association between having a romantic partner and higher wellbeing, and that this pathway was stronger for men than for women.

Why it matters

This study provides empirical panel data to support the theory that relationship status confers greater subjective wellbeing benefits to men partly because of a stronger reliance on romantic partners for perceived social support.

Limits

The abstract provides no numerical data, effect sizes, or test statistics. The study relies on observational self-report data from a single country (New Zealand), which limits causal inference and cross-cultural generalizability.