Niederdeppe · American journal of public health 2004 · Comparative cross-sectional study · n=?

Confirming "truth": more evidence of a successful tobacco countermarketing campaign in Florida.

Level 3 - non-randomized controlled study

Non-randomized comparative observational study

PubMed 14759936 · doi:10.2105/ajph.94.2.255 · record verified 2026-08-26

What was done

The study evaluated Florida's "truth" tobacco countermarketing campaign by comparing adolescent smoking rates, campaign awareness, and anti-tobacco beliefs between fall 2001 and spring 2002 against pre-campaign trends.

What was found

Smoking rates were described as substantially lower among Florida teens between fall 2001 and spring 2002 compared to pre-campaign baselines. Florida adolescents had higher awareness of the "truth" campaign and were more likely to endorse campaign-targeted beliefs; two of these beliefs were the only items associated with current smoking. The abstract reports no numerical values, effect sizes, or statistical estimates.

Why it matters

It provides real-world observational evidence that targeted state-level countermarketing interventions can influence adolescent beliefs and reduce youth smoking.

Limits

The abstract lacks sample sizes, numerical outcomes, and statistical precision metrics. As an observational evaluation, it is vulnerable to confounding from secular trends and unmeasured external influences.

Cited by